Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Introducing Netgate Nexus: Multi-Instance Management at Your Fingertips.

    6100 lost its ix[0-3] interfaces

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    22 Posts 5 Posters 1.9k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      slackie
      last edited by

      Similar issue for me. Any workaround?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S Offline
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        The 6100 should never not see the ix NICs. They are in the SoC and cannot be disabled. What exactly are you seeing?

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S Offline
          slackie @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 I already raised a TAC. I basically get the same error as OP. Tried power cycling and boot from USB-installer.

          They're not in the ifconfig output and bootup gives errors like this:

          Feb  5 22:46:21 pfSense kernel: ix0: <Intel(R) X553 L (1GbE)> mem 0x80200000-0x803fffff,0x80600000-0x80603fff at device 0.1 on pci10
          
          Feb  5 22:46:21 pfSense kernel: ix0: Hardware initialization failed
          
          Feb  5 22:46:21 pfSense kernel: ix0: IFDI_ATTACH_PRE failed 5
          
          Feb  5 22:46:21 pfSense kernel: device_attach: ix0 attach returned 5
          
          

          They are present as PCI devices but either not in a usable state or the system doesn't know what they are:

          
          none6@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x1306 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000
          
             vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
          
             class      = network
          
             subclass   = ethernet
          
             bar   [10] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80a00000, size 2097152, enabled
          
             bar   [20] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80c04000, size 16384, enabled
          
          none7@pci0:3:0:1: class=0x020000 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x1306 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000
          
             vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
          
             class      = network
          
             subclass   = ethernet
          
             bar   [10] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80800000, size 2097152, enabled
          
             bar   [20] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80c00000, size 16384, enabled
          
          none8@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x15e5 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000
          
             vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
          
             device     = 'Ethernet Connection X553 1GbE'
          
             class      = network
          
             subclass   = ethernet
          
             bar   [10] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80400000, size 2097152, enabled
          
             bar   [20] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80604000, size 16384, enabled
          
          none9@pci0:2:0:1: class=0x020000 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x15e5 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000
          
             vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
          
             device     = 'Ethernet Connection X553 1GbE'
          
             class      = network
          
             subclass   = ethernet
          
             bar   [10] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80200000, size 2097152, enabled
          
             bar   [20] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0x80600000, size 16384, enabled
          
          
          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            slackie @slackie
            last edited by

            To me, after reading about others with similar issues (non netgate HW), this is a firmware glitch. In those cases this has been resolved through a forced NIC firmware upgrade.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S Offline
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Hmm. I assume it's out of warranty?

              You could try booting Intel's firmware update tool and see if it sees the NICs or offers an available update. I've never tried that on a 6100 though.

              luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • luckman212L Offline
                luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                last edited by

                try booting Intel's firmware update tool

                which tool is that @stephenw10 ? is it this? https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/download/19358/non-volatile-memory-nvm-update-utility-for-intel-ethernet-network-adapter-x550-series.html

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S Offline
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Hmm X553 is not X550. But I see it's in the release notes so might be worth trying. However I don't see it in the update itself so....

                  luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • luckman212L Offline
                    luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    Yeah not sure either. The Release Notes PDF has:

                    12618d69-6608-468b-b5c5-25d002944aa7-CleanShot 2026-02-09 at 11.01.55.png

                    and extracting X550_NVMUpdatePackage_v3_70_FreeBSD.tar.gz and executing strings ./X550/FreeBSDx64/nvmupdate64e | grep 553 yields some results:

                    X553
                    Intel(R) Ethernet Connection X553 1GbE
                    Intel(R) Ethernet Connection X553 10 GbE SFP+
                    Intel(R) Ethernet Connection X553 QSFP+
                    Intel(R) Ethernet Connection X553 Backplane
                    Intel(R) Ethernet Connection X553/X557-AT 10GBASE-T
                    Intel(R) X553 Virtual Function
                    Intel(R) Ethernet Connection X553 1 GbE
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • S Offline
                      slackie
                      last edited by

                      Ill give it a try later this evening. Thanks!

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • T Offline
                        tedquade @slackie
                        last edited by

                        @slackie Let us know how it goes. I've been sitting in the weeds watching this thread with interest.

                        Ted

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S Offline
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          There's no update cfg for the X553 PCI device ID in that file so something else is required....

                          luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • luckman212L Offline
                            luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 Hmm. Yeah there's some further discussion about this over on r/Netgate, including comments from Jim Thompson (gonzopancho).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • stephenw10S Offline
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Ah right. Yup that's what I'm seeing. It wouldn't entirely surprise me to find there is no NVM update for X553 since its on-board the SoC. It's not a normal NIC in that sense.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • X Offline
                                xtp237
                                last edited by

                                OP, Here. @stephenw10 and @slackie, support determined it was a hardware failure. Unfortunately, it was no longer under warranty.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S Offline
                                  slackie
                                  last edited by

                                  Unfortunately it didn't work. I give up...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.